Composable CDP
What is a Composable CDP?
A composable CDP (Customer Data Platform) is a modular approach to customer data infrastructure where companies assemble their own CDP architecture by combining best-of-breed components—typically a cloud data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) as the central data store, data integration tools (Fivetran, Airbyte) for ingestion, transformation layers (dbt) for data modeling, and activation tools (Census, Hightouch) for syncing data to downstream applications. Unlike packaged CDPs that provide all-in-one proprietary platforms, composable CDPs leverage existing data infrastructure investments and modern data stack components to achieve similar customer data unification, segmentation, and activation capabilities with greater flexibility and control.
The composable CDP approach reflects a fundamental architectural shift in how companies manage customer data. Rather than centralizing all customer data processing, storage, and activation within a single vendor's platform, the composable model treats the cloud data warehouse as the central repository of truth—with specialized tools handling ingestion, transformation, and activation tasks. This architecture enables companies to maintain data governance and ownership within their own infrastructure, swap components as technology evolves, and leverage analytics and business intelligence tools directly against unified customer data without extracting it to separate systems.
According to Gartner's research on customer data platforms, the composable CDP category has emerged as the fastest-growing segment of the CDP market, particularly among companies that have already invested significantly in cloud data warehouses and modern data stack infrastructure. Adoption is highest among technology companies, digital-native brands, and data-mature organizations that value flexibility and control over turnkey convenience. Forrester's analysis of CDP trends suggests that by 2027, 40% of enterprises will adopt composable approaches rather than packaged CDP platforms, driven by superior economics for high-data-volume use cases, desire to avoid vendor lock-in, and ability to leverage existing data warehouse investments.
Key Takeaways
Warehouse-Centric Architecture: Composable CDPs use cloud data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) as the central customer data repository rather than proprietary CDP databases
Best-of-Breed Components: Companies assemble their CDP by selecting specialized tools for each function—ingestion, transformation, identity resolution, and activation—rather than accepting single-vendor suites
Data Ownership and Control: All customer data remains within the company's data warehouse under their governance and security policies, avoiding data duplication in external vendor systems
Flexibility and Adaptability: Component-based architecture enables swapping tools as technology evolves, adding new data sources or destinations, and customizing data models without platform migration
Higher Setup Complexity: Composable CDPs require more technical sophistication and integration effort compared to packaged CDP platforms, trading implementation simplicity for long-term flexibility
How It Works
Composable CDP architecture operates through interconnected components working together to deliver customer data unification and activation:
Cloud Data Warehouse Foundation: The architecture begins with a cloud data warehouse (Snowflake, Google BigQuery, Amazon Redshift, or Databricks) serving as the central repository for all customer data. Unlike traditional CDPs that store customer data in proprietary databases, composable CDPs centralize everything in the warehouse where it's accessible to analytics tools, business intelligence platforms, data science teams, and activation systems. This warehouse-centric approach consolidates customer data alongside other business data (product, sales, support) enabling comprehensive cross-functional analysis without data movement.
Data Ingestion and Integration: Specialized ETL/ELT tools extract customer data from various sources and load it into the data warehouse. Platforms like Fivetran, Airbyte, Stitch, and Segment handle connectors to CRMs, marketing automation, product analytics, support systems, e-commerce platforms, and advertising tools. These ingestion tools replicate data from source systems to the warehouse on regular schedules (hourly, daily) or in near-real-time streams. Unlike packaged CDPs where ingestion is tightly coupled to the platform, composable architectures let companies choose ingestion tools based on connector coverage, reliability, and cost efficiency.
Identity Resolution and Unification: With raw customer data in the warehouse, identity resolution tools or custom SQL models stitch together customer touchpoints across systems and devices to create unified customer profiles. This involves matching records using deterministic identifiers (email addresses, user IDs) and probabilistic matching based on behavioral patterns and attributes. Tools like data transformation platforms (dbt) enable teams to build custom identity resolution logic tailored to their business rules. Some companies use specialized identity resolution services while others build in-warehouse logic using SQL transformations. According to research from Census on composable architectures, the warehouse-based approach often provides better identity resolution for companies with complex customer journeys because all data is available for analysis without platform limitations.
Data Transformation and Modeling: Data transformation layers (typically dbt) transform raw ingested data into business-ready customer attributes, segments, and derived metrics. Marketing operations teams define audience segments, calculate customer lifecycle stages, score leads and accounts, and create personalization attributes—all as SQL models that materialize as tables and views in the warehouse. This transformation layer serves as the business logic engine, translating raw event streams and system data into marketing-ready customer attributes. The benefit over packaged CDPs is complete transparency and customizability of business logic without proprietary platform limitations.
Reverse ETL and Activation: The final component syncs transformed customer data from the warehouse to operational systems where marketing, sales, and customer success teams work. Reverse ETL tools like Census, Hightouch, and Polytomic read audience segments and customer attributes from warehouse tables and sync them to destinations including marketing automation (HubSpot, Marketo), advertising platforms (Google Ads, Facebook), CRMs (Salesforce), customer success tools (Gainsight), and personalization engines. This activation layer completes the composable CDP loop—data flows from operational systems into the warehouse, gets unified and transformed, then syncs back to operational tools for campaign execution and personalization. Platforms like Saber can enhance composable CDPs by providing external company and contact signals that enrich warehouse customer profiles with real-time business intelligence.
Analytics and Insights: Throughout this architecture, business intelligence tools (Looker, Tableau, Mode) and analytics platforms connect directly to the warehouse providing comprehensive customer analytics, cohort analysis, attribution modeling, and predictive analytics without extracting data to separate systems. This integrated approach eliminates the analytics silos common in packaged CDP architectures where customer intelligence lives separately from broader business analytics.
Key Features
Modular Component Architecture: Combines specialized best-of-breed tools for ingestion, storage, transformation, and activation rather than depending on single-vendor capabilities
Data Warehouse as Source of Truth: Centralizes all customer data in the company's cloud data warehouse under internal governance rather than vendor-controlled proprietary databases
Transparent Business Logic: All customer segmentation, scoring, and attribute calculation happens in version-controlled SQL transformations rather than black-box platform logic
Native Analytics Integration: Business intelligence and analytics tools access unified customer data directly in the warehouse without separate extraction or replication
Flexible Tool Selection: Companies choose and swap components as needs evolve without wholesale platform migration or data extraction challenges
Use Cases
Marketing Personalization and Segmentation
Marketing teams use composable CDPs to build sophisticated audience segments and personalization attributes for omnichannel campaign execution. Instead of defining segments within proprietary CDP interfaces with platform-specific limitations, marketers work with data teams to define audience logic as SQL transformations in the warehouse. For example, building a segment like "high-value customers at risk of churn who haven't engaged with recent product launches" involves joining product usage data, support interactions, transaction history, and engagement metrics—all available in the warehouse. Once defined as materialized views, these segments sync to email platforms, advertising systems, and website personalization engines via reverse ETL. Changes to segment logic update centrally in the warehouse and propagate to all destinations automatically, eliminating the manual segment rebuilding required when using multiple disconnected tools.
Cross-Functional Customer Intelligence
Composable CDP architecture enables analytics use cases extending beyond marketing to product, sales, customer success, and executive teams. Because customer data lives in the warehouse alongside product, financial, and operational data, analysts build comprehensive dashboards combining customer behavior with business outcomes. Product teams analyze feature adoption patterns across customer segments. Sales operations teams build lead scoring models incorporating product usage, engagement, and fit signals. Customer success creates health scores combining usage metrics, support interactions, NPS feedback, and renewal likelihood. Finance models customer lifetime value and cohort economics. This cross-functional accessibility represents a major advantage over packaged CDPs where customer intelligence remains isolated in marketing-controlled platforms requiring data extraction for broader organizational use.
Build vs Buy for Data-Mature Companies
Organizations with existing cloud data warehouse investments and modern data stack infrastructure choose composable CDP approaches to avoid redundant data storage and leverage existing capabilities. A company already using Snowflake for analytics, Fivetran for data ingestion, and dbt for transformations can add reverse ETL tooling (Census or Hightouch) to achieve CDP activation capabilities without implementing an entirely separate platform. This approach delivers superior economics—especially for high-data-volume scenarios where packaged CDP pricing based on MTRs (monthly tracked records) or events can become prohibitively expensive. Composable architectures also eliminate vendor lock-in concerns, enabling gradual component replacement as technology evolves without wholesale platform migrations requiring data extraction and reimplementation.
Implementation Example
Here's a practical composable CDP architecture for a B2B SaaS company:
Related Terms
Customer Data Platform: The broader category of platforms for customer data unification that composable CDPs represent an architectural alternative to
Reverse ETL: The activation layer technology that syncs transformed data from warehouses to operational tools, enabling composable CDP functionality
Data Warehouse: The cloud storage and compute platforms (Snowflake, BigQuery) that serve as the foundation for composable CDP architectures
Modern Data Stack: The ecosystem of cloud-native data tools including warehouses, ingestion, transformation, and activation components that compose CDPs leverage
Data Transformation: The process of converting raw data into business-ready formats that dbt and similar tools enable in composable architectures
Identity Resolution: The customer profile unification process that composable CDPs implement through warehouse-based SQL transformations
Data Orchestration: Workflow scheduling and management systems that coordinate composable CDP component operations
GTM Data Warehouse: Specialized data warehouses focused on go-to-market data that composable CDPs often extend or leverage
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a composable CDP?
Quick Answer: A composable CDP is a modular customer data platform architecture where companies assemble their own CDP by combining cloud data warehouses, ingestion tools, transformation layers, and activation systems rather than implementing all-in-one packaged CDP platforms.
A composable CDP uses the company's cloud data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) as the central customer data repository, with specialized tools handling ingestion (Fivetran, Airbyte), transformation (dbt), and activation (Census, Hightouch) functions. This architecture delivers CDP capabilities—customer profile unification, segmentation, and multi-channel activation—while maintaining data ownership in the warehouse, enabling transparent business logic through SQL transformations, and allowing component-by-component tool selection. Composable CDPs appeal particularly to data-mature organizations with existing warehouse investments who value flexibility, control, and economics over turnkey convenience. The approach emerged from the modern data stack movement and reflects architectural trends toward warehouse-centric data operations rather than isolated application-specific data silos.
What's the difference between composable and packaged CDPs?
Quick Answer: Packaged CDPs provide all-in-one proprietary platforms handling ingestion, storage, transformation, and activation, while composable CDPs assemble these functions from best-of-breed components using the company's data warehouse as the foundation.
Packaged CDPs (Segment, mParticle, Treasure Data, Adobe CDP) offer complete platforms with proprietary databases, pre-built connectors, visual segment builders, and managed activation—optimized for speed of implementation with less technical complexity. Composable CDPs combine warehouse storage (Snowflake), ingestion tools (Fivetran), transformation layers (dbt), and reverse ETL activation (Census)—requiring more initial setup but providing greater flexibility, transparency, and control. Key differences include: data location (proprietary platform vs. company warehouse), business logic (visual interface vs. SQL transformations), tool selection (single vendor vs. best-of-breed components), analytics integration (extract required vs. native warehouse access), and cost structure (MTR/event-based vs. component licensing). Packaged CDPs suit companies prioritizing rapid deployment with standard use cases, while composable approaches fit data-mature organizations valuing flexibility, already invested in warehouse infrastructure, or managing high data volumes where packaged CDP pricing becomes prohibitive.
When should you choose composable over packaged CDP?
Quick Answer: Choose composable CDPs when you have existing cloud data warehouse infrastructure, technical data team capacity, high data volumes making packaged pricing expensive, or requirements for custom data modeling and complete data control.
Composable CDP approaches work best for organizations that have already invested in modern data infrastructure (cloud warehouse, ingestion tools, transformation capabilities) and employ data engineers or analytics engineers who can implement and maintain the architecture. Companies with high customer volumes (millions of profiles) or event volumes (hundreds of millions monthly) often find composable economics superior to packaged CDP pricing based on MTRs or events. Organizations requiring extensive customization—complex identity resolution rules, sophisticated segmentation logic, or unique data model requirements—benefit from composable flexibility versus packaged platform limitations. Companies prioritizing data governance and wanting all customer data under their control in their warehouse rather than vendor systems prefer composable approaches. Conversely, choose packaged CDPs when you lack data engineering resources, need rapid implementation (weeks vs. months), have standard use cases covered by platform capabilities, or manage moderate data volumes where packaged pricing remains reasonable.
What tools do you need for a composable CDP?
Building a composable CDP requires tools across four primary layers. For data warehousing, choose cloud platforms like Snowflake, Google BigQuery, Amazon Redshift, or Databricks as your central data repository. For data ingestion, select ETL/ELT tools like Fivetran, Airbyte, Stitch, or Segment to extract data from source systems and load into the warehouse. For data transformation and business logic, implement dbt (data build tool) or Dataform to create SQL-based data models, perform identity resolution, calculate customer attributes, and define audience segments. For activation, deploy reverse ETL platforms like Census, Hightouch, or Polytomic to sync transformed customer data from the warehouse to operational tools (CRM, marketing automation, advertising platforms). Additionally, you may need orchestration tools (Airflow, Dagster, dbt Cloud) to schedule workflows, BI platforms (Looker, Tableau, Mode) for analytics, and potentially specialized identity resolution services. Platforms like Saber can enhance composable CDPs by providing external company and contact signals that enrich warehouse customer profiles. Most companies start with 4-6 core tools and expand based on specific needs.
How much does a composable CDP cost compared to packaged CDP?
Composable CDP costs depend on data volumes and tool selection but often provide 30-50% savings compared to packaged CDPs for mid-to-high-volume use cases. For a typical implementation with 5 million customer profiles and 100 million monthly events, composable stack costs might include: Snowflake warehouse ($40K-$60K annually), Fivetran ingestion ($20K-$30K), dbt transformation ($10K-$15K), and Census reverse ETL ($25K-$40K)—totaling approximately $95K-$145K annually. Comparable packaged CDP pricing for the same volumes typically ranges $150K-$300K annually based on MTRs (monthly tracked records) or event volumes. Cost advantages increase with data volume—packaged CDP pricing escalates with profile counts and events, while composable component costs scale more gradually. However, composable CDPs require internal data engineering resources for implementation and maintenance, adding hidden costs in personnel that should factor into total cost of ownership comparisons. For lower-volume scenarios (under 1 million profiles), packaged CDPs may offer better economics when factoring in implementation speed and reduced technical overhead. Beyond pure cost, composable approaches provide value through flexibility, data control, and warehouse investment leverage that some organizations weight heavily in build-versus-buy decisions.
Conclusion
Composable CDPs represent a fundamental architectural shift in how data-mature organizations approach customer data infrastructure, trading the turnkey convenience of packaged platforms for the flexibility, control, and economics of warehouse-centric modular architectures. By leveraging cloud data warehouses as the central customer data repository and assembling specialized tools for ingestion, transformation, and activation, companies maintain complete data ownership, achieve transparent and customizable business logic, and integrate customer intelligence seamlessly with broader analytics capabilities—all while often realizing 30-50% cost savings compared to packaged CDP alternatives at scale.
For marketing and revenue operations teams, composable CDPs deliver sophisticated customer segmentation, multi-channel activation, and personalization capabilities rivaling packaged platforms while enabling cross-functional data access that isolated CDP silos cannot match. Product teams, customer success, finance, and data science can all work directly with unified customer data in the warehouse rather than requesting extracts from marketing-controlled systems. This democratization of customer intelligence, combined with the ability to customize identity resolution, segmentation logic, and activation workflows to precise business requirements, makes composable approaches increasingly attractive for organizations with technical capacity to implement them.
Looking forward, the composable CDP category will continue growing as warehouse capabilities advance, reverse ETL tools mature, and more companies adopt modern data stack infrastructure. The approach aligns with broader trends toward data warehouse centralization, avoidance of vendor lock-in, and preference for best-of-breed component selection over monolithic platforms. Platforms like Saber will integrate naturally with composable architectures, enriching warehouse customer profiles with external company and contact signals through straightforward API connections. For organizations evaluating customer data platform strategies, the composable versus packaged decision should weigh technical capacity, existing infrastructure investments, data volumes, customization requirements, and long-term flexibility priorities. Explore related concepts like reverse ETL, data warehouse strategies, and modern data stack architecture to understand composable CDP foundations.
Last Updated: January 18, 2026
